Skip to main content
First Circuit· 8/20/2002

United States v. Diaz

Citations

  • 300 F.3d 66
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16669
  • 2002 WL 1880370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “there is no particular procedure that the trial court is required to follow in executing its gatekeeping function under Daubert”
  • explaining that there is \no particular - 27 - procedure that the trial court is required to follow in executing its gatekeeping function\
  • noting that because “Rule 702 encompasses an array of expert witness issues,” an objection on the basis of one or more of its criteria must advise the court of the specific Rule 702 provision being challenged
  • applying plain error review after concluding that an objection to an expert’s qualifications was insufficient to preserve a challenge to the reliability of the expert’s methods
  • \The consequence of a party's failure to make a timely objection to the admission of expert testimony is plain error review....\
  • “The three numbered criteria were added to Rule 702 in a recent amendment codifying the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert. . . and its progeny, including Kumho . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Bownes, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.