United States v. Mikutowicz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no duty to investigate where juror expressed doubt about her ability to determine guilt because that conversation was “a far cry from a conversation in which the jurors discussed the merits of the parties’ positions”
• “Expert testimony proffered solely to establish the meaning of a law is presumptively improper.” (quoting United States v. Prigmore, 243 F.3d 1, 18 n.3 (1st Cir. 2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).