United States v. Danilo Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court fulfilled its gatekeeping role initially but that it failed to do so “throughout [the expert’s] testimony” where it was apparent that the expert was not reliably applying their methodology
• acknowledging expert witness testimony can be highly influential and, to avoid jury confusion, requires heightened safeguards when individuals serve as both expert and fact witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).