Skip to main content
· 6/6/2012

United States v. Avitia-Guillen

Citations

  • 680 F.3d 1253
  • 88 Fed. R. Serv. 853
  • 2012 WL 2019139
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • findings as to expert qualifications, though brief, \adequately demonstrate\ district court performed gatekeeping duty
  • “Where a party objects only to an expert’s qualifications, he does not preserve an objection to the expert’s methodology.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Baldock, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.