Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Ruling that sovereign citizen claims in the case were without merits, patently frivolous, and should be rejected without wasting anymore of the Court’s resources on their discussion
• ruling that sovereign citizen claims in the case were without merits, patently frivolous, and should be rejected without wasting anymore of the Court’s resources on their discussion
• holding that defendant's “sovereign citizen” argument was “completely without merit” and “patently frivolous”
• holding that defendant's “sovereign citizen” argument was “completely without merit” and “patently frivolous”
• holding that defendant’s “sovereign citizen” argument was “completely without merit” and “patently frivolous”
• holding that defendant’s “sovereign citizen” argument was “completely without merit” and “patently frivolous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).