United States v. Earnest Washington, United States of America v. Wendell E. Fortenberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “consideration requirement of the statute has been interpreted in the traditional sense of a bargained-for exchange”
• “Evidence of other drug transactions is relevant to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intentionally participated in a conspiracy and was not merely an unwitting or uninvolved bystander.”
• “consideration requirement of the statute has been interpreted in the traditional sense of a bargained-for exchange”
• “Payment of this amount of heroin . . . is sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 1958(b) . . . .”
• payment of 5 ounces of heroin
• payment of 5 ounces of heroin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).