· 4/19/1978
United States v. Michael Bell
Citations
- 573 F.2d 1040
- 44 A.L.R. Fed. 617
- 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11597
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- setting forth the procedure to be follow with respect to the admission of coconspiratorstatements under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E)
- approving procedure of provisional admission of statement subject to later scrutiny to discern if government met burden of proof
- establishing the procedure for the admission of co-conspirator statements under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E)
- laying out procedure for the admission of co-conspirator statements under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E)
- permitting the district court to conditionally allow testimony concerning a statement of an alleged co-conspirator subject to later proof, by a preponderance of independent evidence, that the declarant was a coconspirator
- permitting court to conditionally accept out-of-court statement made by an alleged coconspirator
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthes, Lay, Hanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.