Fifth Circuit· 4/5/2010

United States v. Davis

Citations

602 F.3d 643
602 F. Supp. 3d 643
2010 WL 1254634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting case law unsettled as to whether \precedent requires remand whenever an appellant can show a reasonable probability that an unpreserved error affected the sentence\
noting case law unsettled as to whether “precedent requires remand whenever an appellant can show a reasonable probability that an unpreserved error affected the sentence”
considering the defendant’s continued violations of the law in upholding his sentence even though the district court had conducted an erroneous Guidelines calculation at sentencing
declining to exercise discretion in factual situation involving a defendant who “violated his supervised release only five months into a five-year sentence”
declining to exercise discretion where a 15 to 21 month range was incorrect and a 6 to 12 month range was appropriate
declining to correct sentencing guidelines error in ease where defendant was found violating numerous terms of his supervised release five months into his five-year sentence and apparently planning a return to his prior criminal activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jolly and Stewart, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.