United States v. Fortino Saucedo Villegas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this court continues after Booker to review the district court’s interpretation and application of the Guidelines de novo
• holding that the plain error standard applies when a defendant fails to object to a sentencing enhancement
• concluding that this court continues after Booker to review the district court’s interpretation and application of the Guidelines de novo
• holding that district court committed clear error by committing an obvious error that caused it to impose a sentence that resulted from its incorrect application of the Guidelines
• concluding that “when a district court has imposed a sentence under the Guidelines, this court continues, after Booker, to review the district court’s interpretation and application of the Guidelines de novo.”
• holding that error resulting in non-overlapping sentencing ranges affects the defendant’s substantial rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).