United States v. Roberto Aguirre-Villa, A/K/A Jose Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “Congress must have thought the disparity warranted when it authorized early disposition programs without altering § 3553(a)(6)”
• affirming a within-guidelines sentence where the defendant argued, inter alia, that his offense constituted only an international trespass
• explaining “Congress must have thought the disparity warranted when it authorized early disposition programs without altering § 3553(a)(6)”
• rejecting contentions that the defendant had committed what was “ ‘at bottom’” merely “an international trespass” and that his within-guidelines sentence was too severe for the crime and thus unreasonable
• “[T]his Court will not ordinarily consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief”.
• rejecting argument that illegal reentry is a mere trespass offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).