United States v. Danielle Pauline Ravitch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, under plain-error review, it is pointless to remand if the district court could have imposed the same sentence
• affirming the defendant’s sentence even though the district court’s method of departing may have been incorrect because the 5 district court could have imposed the same sentence if it had properly applied the guidelines
• “As we must uphold a sentence reviewed for plain error if the court could lawfully and reasonably reinstate it on remand, we address each of these bases for departure in turn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).