United States v. Charles Williamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “we afford great deference to a district judge’s credibility determinations” at sentencing (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining, in sentencing context, that “we afford great deference to a district judge’s credibility determinations and how the court may choose to weigh the evidence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• describing deference afforded credibility determinations
• describing deference afforded credibility determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).