United States v. James Ronald Hazelwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that remand is unnecessary where “we are certain that any such error was harmless—i.e. any such error did not affect the district court’s selection of the sentence imposed”
• confirming that errors at sentencing are subject to harmless error review
• if the error alleged “did not affect the district court’s selection of the sentence imposed” the court will not vacate and remand
• defendant’s objection to a criminal history enhancement that a prior crime “did not involve any jail time” did not preserve argument on appeal that the prior crime was not a felony
• maintaining pre-Booker standards for Guidelines interpretation and enhancement fact-findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).