Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 6/10/2003

United States v. Barajas

Citations

  • 331 F.3d 1141
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11538
  • 2003 WL 21322179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Defendant has not suggested any reason why his counsel could not have anticipated the conditions imposed by the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Barajas

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.