Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 11/21/2005

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 429 F.3d 952
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 25106
  • 2005 WL 3105700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order requiring the defendant to keep current on unrelated restitution obligations is not \restitution\ but rather a requirement to obey the law
  • “[B]ecause Ms. Mitchell was already legally obligated to pay the restitution from her previous convictions, the challenged condition of supervised release” requiring her to remain current on her restitution payments “is not a ‘deprivation of liberty.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McConnell, Holloway, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.