United States v. York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a decision is a core judicial function if it is a “significant penological decision” such as determining whether a probationer should undergo specific types of treatment
• holding that there was no threat of revocation of supervised release because the court construed a condition of the release as prohibiting revocation based on a valid assertion of the Fifth Amendment
• concluding that the defendant “cannot mount a generalized Fifth Amendment attack on the conditions of his supervised release on the ground that he will be required to answer probation officers’ questions truthfully.”
• reasoning that setting a schedule for polygraph testing is a “matter of administrative detail,” not a core judicial func- tion
• reasoning that setting a schedule for polygraph testing is a “matter of administrative detail,” not a core judicial func- tion
• upholding sex offender conditions based on prior convictions for indecent assault on minors, nine years and three years before sentencing, respectively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).