United States v. Wayne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant was time-barred from 2 Appellate Case: 21-8087 Document: 010110722909 Date Filed: 08/10/2022 Page: 20 making a facial challenge to a supervised release condition at a compliance hearing because she had failed to appeal from the judgment imposing the sentence
• declining to address an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief
• declining to address an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief
• “Because [the appellant] raised this argument for the first time in her reply brief, she has waived it on appeal.”
• “Because [the appellant] raised this argument for the first time in her reply brief, she has waived it on appeal.”
• The supervisee “should have challenged the legal and factual basis of the initial supervised release condition on direct appeal from the sentencing court’s judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).