Skip to main content
· 4/16/2013

United States v. Mi Sun Cho

Citations

  • 713 F.3d 716
  • 2013 WL 1594173
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] defendant does not have an unfettered right to offer testimony that is inadmissible under the rules of evidence.”
  • “[A] defendant does not have an unfettered right to offer testimony that is inadmissible under the rules of evidence.” (quoting Washington v. Schriver, 255 F.3d 45, 56 (2d Cir. 2001)
  • internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted; emphasis in original
  • internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted; emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Sack, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.