United States v. Litwok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that barring an accountant from verifying the accuracy of trading account statements that the accountant claimed were inaccurate constituted an affirmative act for tax evasion purposes
• finding that government, as appellee, forfeited argument not pursed on appeal
• finding aiding and abetting mail and wire fraud constitute predicate acts under 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)
• listing elements of a substantive violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201
• “Because this is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial, the [ ] facts are drawn from the trial evidence and described in the light most favorable to the Government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).