United States v. Mahaffy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Carpenter requires proof that the information was both considered and treated by [the source] in a way that maintained the [source’s] exclusive right to the information.”
• evidence may be subject to Brady when it has both incriminating and exculpatory aspects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).