United States v. Arthur David Lemaster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that in order for a statement to be admissible under Rule 803(3), \the declarant must not have had an opportunity to reflect and possibly fabricate or misrepresent his thoughts\
• affirming conviction of state senator for making false statements to the FBI during investigation of corruption in the Kentucky General Assembly
• rejecting the defendant’s contention that the guidelines applicable to violations of § 1001 already take into account circumstances involving lies told to conceal other crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).