United States v. Margaret Neely, Forest Bailey, Steve Johnson, Cornell Stokes, and Ben Israel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim of prejudicial variance between indictment’s allegation of a “single conspiracy” and the proof at trial, which allegedly established “multiple schemes,” because defendant raising the challenge was never charged or convicted of conspiracy
• to preserve an issue for appellate review, a party must alert the district court to the specific grounds for the party’s argument
• the most important factor is the strength of the evidence against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).