Sixth Circuit· 10/20/2000

United States v. Lawrence Ray Carmichael

Citations

232 F.3d 510
54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1400
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26055
2000 WL 1545781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that ex parte discussions between a prosecutor and a judge concerning the contents of Title III wiretap transcripts is not a critical stage
holding that ex parte discussions between a prosecutor and a judge concerning the contents of Title III wiretap transcripts is not a critical stage
calling ex parte hearings with the government a “dangerous procedure” (quoting Minsky, 963 F.2d at 874)
calling ex parte hearings with the government a “dangerous procedure” (quoting Minsky, 963 F.2d at 874)
denying a Sixth Amendment claim based on ex parte communication between government and judge because the criminal defendant, who knew about the communication, failed to object at trial
ex parte discussions between prosecutor and judge concerning the contents of Title III wiretap transcripts not a critical stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Daughtrey, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.