United States v. Aptt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Hawkins held that counsel had effectively waived the defendant’s rights by stipulation despite the attorney’s apparent confusion about the scope of that stipulation.”
• “[C]ounsel in a criminal case may waive his client’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation by stipulating to the admission of evidence.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).