Tenth Circuit· 1/21/2004

United States v. Aptt

Citations

354 F.3d 1269
63 Fed. R. Serv. 769
22 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 755
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 872
2004 WL 95862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Hawkins held that counsel had effectively waived the defendant’s rights by stipulation despite the attorney’s apparent confusion about the scope of that stipulation.”
“[C]ounsel in a criminal case may waive his client’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation by stipulating to the admission of evidence.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Anderson, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.