United States v. George Don Galloway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presentation of ineffectiveness claim on direct appeal did not foreclose assertion in federal habeas proceedings of additional grounds for finding inadequate representation
• holding that procedural bar rule does not apply to ineffectiveness claims
• holding that procedural bar rule does not apply to ineffectiveness claims
• concluding that the record had not been fully developed because “[t]he district court never had an opportunity to consider those claims, much less develop a record on the issue”
• noting that “we will not remand” to develop record or obtain district-court ruling on IAC claims brought “during the direct appeal of a case”
• observing that reasons advanced on direct appeal in support of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim cannot be reurged in a § 2255 motion because of the doctrine of issue preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).