Skip to main content
· 1/5/2011

United States v. Flonnory

Citations

  • 630 F.3d 1280
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 139
  • 2011 WL 14465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing for plain error the defendant's argument as to adequacy of sentencing court's perjury findings when the defendant did not object on that ground
  • reviewing for plain error the defendant’s argument as to the adequacy of district court’s perjury findings when the defendant did not object on that ground at the trial level
  • “The facts necessary to calculate the guidelines sentencing range must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Seymour, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.