Union Insurance v. Hull & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to find infringement where the accused device omitted a structural limitation that would not be met until the accused infringers sold the device to the distributors who then made changes which met the claim limitation
• finding a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant had actual knowledge of a patent when the plaintiff’s products bore patent markings and the plaintiff produced emails showing that the defendant was aware of the products that were marked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).