Bank of America, N.A. v. UMB Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff \is not a FINRA member and did not directly agree to subject itself to arbitration under FINRA's terms\
• declining to consider argument “because it was . . . raised for the first time in a reply brief”
• applying Missouri contract law in rejecting an \intertwined\ theory of estoppel as a basis for allowing a signatory to an arbitration agreement to compel arbitration against a nonsignatory
• applying Missouri contract law in rejecting an “intertwined” theory of estoppel as a basis for allowing a signatory to an arbitration agreement to compel arbitration against a nonsignatory
• exercising jurisdiction even though the “district court denied the motion to compel arbitration ‘without prejudice’ and expressed its intent to preserve the status quo until it could hear argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).