Skip to main content
· 5/21/2004

Steve R. Faber v. Menard, Inc.

Citations

  • 367 F.3d 1048
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10054
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,722
  • 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1730
  • 2004 WL 1124431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the arbitration agreement at issue required the parties to each pay one half of the arbitrator’s fees and their own attorney’s fees
  • noting that the arbitration agreement at issue required the parties to each pay one half of the arbitrator's fees and their own attorney's fees
  • stating that an arbitration agreement will generally be upheld “unless a party can show that it will not be able to vindicate its rights in the arbitral forum”
  • holding plaintiff failed to make the required showing because he failed to provide evidence to estimate the cost of arbitration and the amount of arbitrator’s fees in addition to his specific financial situation
  • ordering district court to sever fee-splitting provision on remand if court determines that the provision would preclude Faber from vindicating his statutory rights
  • ordering district court to sever fee-splitting provision on remand if court determines that the provision would preclude Faber from vindicating his statutory rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Fagg, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.