Skip to main content
· 3/9/2007

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Louella Rollins v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society, And/or Omaha Woodmen Life Insurance Society

Citations

  • 479 F.3d 561
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5528
  • 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,732
  • 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an arbitration agreement between employee and employer was not unconscionable under Nebraska law
  • first query on a motion to compel arbitration is “whether there is a valid arbitration agreement”
  • in addressing a motion to compel arbitration the second query for the court is “whether the particular dispute falls within the terms of that agreement’ ”
  • \Title VII explicitly preserves the employee's unconditional right to vindicate her own interests by intervening in the EEOC's enforcement action.\
  • \Title VII explicitly preserves the employee's unconditional right to vindicate her own interests by intervening in the EEOC's enforcement action.\
  • “The validity of the arbitration agreement is determined by state contract law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Hansen, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.