N.D. California· 7/14/2004
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Bertelsmann AG
Citations
- 222 F.R.D. 408
- 75 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1132
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he possibility of 7 prejudice to the original parties is in fact the ‘principal consideration’ when deciding a motion to 8 intervene.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Umg Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LlcNinth Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 236×
- In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationNinth Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 60×
- In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationN.D. California· 2005-05-31· cited 12×
- In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationN.D. California· 2005-02-03· cited 10×
- UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLCNinth Circuit· 2011-12-20· cited 9×
- UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Hummer Winblad Venture PartnersN.D. California· 2005-02-03· cited 1×
- UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Hummer Winblad Venture PartnersN.D. California· 2005-05-31· cited 1×
- In Re: Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation UMG Recording, Inc. v. Bertsmann AgNinth Circuit· 2007-03-13
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsNinth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 2,313×
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2003-08-26· cited 2,266×
- Navarro v. BlockNinth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 2,226×
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1996-03-25· cited 1,178×
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2001-02-12· cited 489×
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanNinth Circuit· 1986-06-20· cited 487×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court· 1940-05-27· cited 485×
- Robert Van Buskirk, M.D.L., 1257, in Re Cable News Network v. Cable News Network, Inc., Time Inc., and Time Warner Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-03-20· cited 388×
- Gershwin Publishing Corporation v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., and Community Concerts, Inc.Second Circuit· 1971-05-24· cited 305×
- Donnelly v. GlickmanNinth Circuit· 1998-10-22· cited 172×
- Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1990-06-04· cited 155×
- Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc. Richard Pilegard, W.D. Mitchell, Margaret MitchellNinth Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 154×
- Kootenai Tribe of Idaho v. VenemanNinth Circuit· 2002-12-12· cited 101×
- Arakaki v. CayetanoNinth Circuit· 2003-05-13· cited 74×
- Venegas v. SkaggsNinth Circuit· 1989-01-31· cited 71×
- United States v. WashingtonNinth Circuit· 1996-06-12· cited 58×
- Lewis v. Telephone Employees Credit UnionNinth Circuit· 1996-06-20· cited 57×
- A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Napster, Inc.N.D. California· 2000-08-10· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.