· 8/10/2000
A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Napster, Inc.
Citations
- 114 F. Supp. 2d 896
- 55 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1780
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11862
- 2000 WL 1182467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that evidence of unauthorized uploading and downloading of copyrighted music by Napster users established a prima facie case of direct copyright infringement
- finding that Napster’s representations to the court regarding “its improved methods of blocking users about whom rights holders complain ... is tantamount to an admission that defendant can, and sometimes does, police its service”
- finding that evidence of unauthorized uploading and downloading of copyrighted music by Napster users established a pri-ma facie case of direct copyright infringement
- “Religious Technology Center would not mandate a determination that Napster, Inc. lacks the knowledge requisite to contributory infringement.”
- “Napster is an integrated service designed to enable users to locate and download MP3 music files.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.