Skip to main content
· 3/25/1996

Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 80 F.3d 336
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1974
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 3349
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 5211
  • 1996 WL 128149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining court must construe all reasonable inferences in favor of 14 plaintiff when reviewing motion to dismiss
  • denial of leave to amend is not an abuse of discretion where further amendment would 24 be futile
  • “allegations of material fact are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to [plaintiff]”
  • denial 14 of leave to amend is not an abuse of discretion where further amendment would be futile
  • if amendment would be futile, leave to amend need not be given
  • dismissal for failure to state a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Skopil, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.