Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that treating physicians are not \expert witnesses\ within meaning of then-applicable pretrial disclosure rule
• determining that treating physicians are not “expert witnesses” within meaning of then-applicable pretrial disclosure rule
• noting that improperly admitted evidence requires a new trial only where it appears to have affected the outcome of the trial
• determining that treating physicians are not “expert witnesses” within meaning of then-applicable pretrial disclosure rule
• indicating that a new trial should be ordered because of the improper admission of evidence only if it appears that the improperly admitted evidence affected the outcome of the trial
• governing testimony of expert witnesses in civil proceedings at the trial court level

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).