Addison v. Whittenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that examples of this exception include cases in which “the treatment is so common, or the act so grossly negligent, that a layman would be able to make a proper evaluation of the challenged conduct”
• refusing to uphold summary judgment on the basis that the Rule 220 deadline had passed (see 134 Ill. 2d R. 220 (repealed))
• refusing to uphold summary judgment on the basis that the Rule 220 deadline had passed (see 134 Ill. 2d R. 220 (repealed))
• no claim plaintiff did not have sufficient time to procure expert
• no claim plaintiff did not have sufficient time to procure expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).