Healy v. Vaupel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state university instructors performed their duties as state employees when they allegedly failed to teach gymnastics safely
• holding that the claimed negligence of the defendants arose solely out of the performance of their duties as employees of Northern Illinois University and, therefore, exclusive jurisdiction lay in the Court of Claims
• holding that the claimed negligence of the defendants arose solely out of the performance of their duties as employees of Northern Illinois University and, therefore, exclusive jurisdiction lay in the Court of Claims
• finding that claim belonged in the ICC when the complaint did not allege a constitutional violation and sought damages
• noting that Northern Illinois University must “be considered a unit of State government”
• finding that a suit was effectively against the state, not an individual coach at a state university, for violation of a duty identical to duties imposed on coaches at private universities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).