Aguinaga Ex Rel. Chavez v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the expert’s testimony is but the opinion of the witness given on facts assumed to be true; it is the function of the trier of fact to determine the facts (citing Beloit Foundry v. Industrial Comm’n, 62 Ill. 2d 535, 539 (1972))
• finding that the expert’s testimony is but the opinion of the witness given on facts assumed to be true; it is the function of the trier of fact to determine the facts (citing Beloit Foundry v. Industrial Comm’n, 62 Ill. 2d 535, 539 (1976))
• finding that the expert's testimony is but the opinion of the witness given on facts assumed to be true; it is the function of the trier of fact to determine the facts (citing Beloit Foundry v. Industrial Comm'n , 62 Ill. 2d 535 , 539, 343 N.E.2d 504 (1976) )
• “It is the function of the jury to resolve substantial factual disputes requiring either the assessment of [the] witness’ credibility or an election between conflicting evidence”
• expert’s testimony is but the opinion of the witness given on facts assumed to be true; it is the function of the trier of fact to determine the facts
• “The exclusion of evidence is harmless where the evidence excluded was fully established by other evidence ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).