Court of Appeals of Virginia· 11/22/2005
Turner v. Turner
Citations
- 622 S.E.2d 263
- 47 Va. App. 76
- 2005 Va. App. LEXIS 469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming entry of an order calculating the division of the husband’s pension because it “effectuate[d] the expressed intent” of a prior equitable distribution order awarding the wife 50% of the marital share (quoting Code § 20-107.3(K)(4))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frank, Haley, Kelsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Irwin v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-12-28· cited 40×
- Prizzia v. PrizziaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-04-12· cited 25×
- Sandra D. T. Griffin v. David L. Griffin, c/o Kimberly Cowser-Griffin, etc.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2014-01-28· cited 6×
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia· 2019-11-27
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Walt Robbins, Inc. v. Damon CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-09-05· cited 65×
- Norris v. MitchellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1998-01-09· cited 59×
- Caudle v. CaudleCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-16· cited 34×
- Haase v. HaaseCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-08-22· cited 33×
- Flanary v. MiltonSupreme Court of Virginia· 2002-01-11· cited 29×
- Hastie v. HastieCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-06-01· cited 26×
- Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-11-04· cited 25×
- William J. Fahey v. Mary Lucretia FaheyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-02-25· cited 22×
- Primm v. PrimmCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-07-30· cited 17×
- Decker v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-06-11· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.