Skip to main content

Wilson v. Wilson

Citations

  • 492 S.E.2d 495
  • 25 Va. App. 752
  • 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the trial court was without authority [under Code § 20-107.3(K)(4)] to substantively modify its original order equitably distributing husband’s pension benefits”
  • noting that “[r]elief of any type will only be granted when a party specifically requests [that] relief” and that “no court can base its judgment . . . upon a right which has not been pleaded or claimed.”
  • reaching such a conclusion in dicta, based on Reid v. Reid, 245 Va. 409, 415, 429 S.E.2d 208, 211 (1993) (involving request for restitution of spousal support paid under order later declared erroneous)
  • reaching such a conclusion in dicta, based on Reid v. Reid, 245 Va. 409, 415, 429 S.E.2d 208, 211 (1993) (involving request for restitution of spousal support paid under order later declared erroneous)
  • reaching such a conclusion in dicta, based on Reid v. Reid, 245 Va. 409, 415, 429 S.E.2d 208, 211 (1993) (involving request for restitution of spousal support paid under order later declared erroneous)
  • “Relief of any type will only be granted when a party specifically requests the relief in a pleading filed in the proper court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.