Ohio Supreme Court· 9/15/1993

Turner v. Turner

Citations

67 Ohio St. 3d 337
617 N.E.2d 1123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that credibility issues arise in summary judgment proceedings “when one litigant’s statement conflicts with another litigant’s statement over a fact to be proved” and that “summary judgment in such a case is inappropriate”
stating that “resolution of the factual dispute will depend, at least in part, upon the credibility of the parties or their witnesses, summary judgment in such a case is inappropriate”
“[I]t is for the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony”
court may not resolve questions of credibility on summary judgment
defining \material facts\ in the context of Civ.R. 56
movant cannot benefit by changing statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

246 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Turner v. Turner

204 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.