Court of Appeals of Virginia· 8/22/1995
Haase v. Haase
Citations
- 460 S.E.2d 585
- 20 Va. App. 671
- 12 Va. Law Rep. 77
- 1995 Va. App. LEXIS 951
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no bright-line rule that counsel must be present during an in camera interview of a child in divorce proceeding
- “We recognize that questions of child custody, whether in a divorce proceeding or a civil action by the Commonwealth, involve a fundamental liberty interest of the parent.”
- if interview held over objection of the parties, record must be made
- if interview held over objection of the parties, record must be made
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koontz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.