Hastie v. Hastie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that equitable distribution orders become final within twenty-one days of entry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fadness v. Fadness
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-11-04· cited 286×
• Navas v. Navas
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-07-20· cited 34×
• Prizzia v. Prizzia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-04-12· cited 25×
• Williams v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-03-28· cited 18×
• Turner v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-11-22· cited 13×
• Baker v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-06-04· cited 5×
• Pamela A. Spriggs v. Darrell Spriggs
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-08-03· cited 4×
• Jackson v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2019-11-27
• Michael B. Yourko v. Lee Ann B. Yourko
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2021-12-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zipf v. Zipf
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-07-11· cited 72×
• Norris v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-01-09· cited 59×
• Caudle v. Caudle
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-16· cited 34×
• Solomond v. Ball
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-05-07· cited 28×
• William J. Fahey v. Mary Lucretia Fahey
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-02-25· cited 22×
• Primm v. Primm
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-07-30· cited 17×
• Decker v. Decker
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-06-11· cited 13×