Skip to main content

Tucker v. State

Citations

  • 15 S.W.3d 229
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1575
  • 2000 WL 257806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court‘s erroneous ruling regarding improper comments made during jury argument involved non-constitutional error
  • holding that the prosecutor’s argument injecting new facts based on specialized experience was harmless even though the first factor favored reversal because the trial court told the jury to disregard the comment and the evidence of the defendant’s self-defense claim was tenuous
  • finding that the trial court = s erroneous ruling regarding improper comments made during jury argument involved nonconstitutional error
  • holding the trial court‘s erroneous ruling regarding improper comments made during jury argument involved non-constitutional error
  • finding the trial court’s erroneous ruling regarding improper comments made during jury argument involved nonconstitutional error
  • applying the Mosley factors to determine if improper argument during guilt/innocence phase constituted reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie Brock Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.