Skip to main content

Tucker v. Johnson

Citations

  • 211 F. Supp. 3d 95
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135150
  • 2016 WL 5674960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Title VII’s “demanding legal standard” (quoting Bergbauer v. Mabus, 934 F. Supp. 2d 55, 77 n.20 (D.D.C. 2013))
  • discussing Title VII’s “demanding legal standard” (quoting Bergbauer v. Mabus, 934 F. Supp. 2d 55, 77 n.20 (D.D.C. 2013))
  • “General feelings of workplace discomfort or unease . . . are simply not enough to support a claim for hostile work environment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Amit P. Mehta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.