Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 4/29/1998

Truesdale v. Moore

Citations

  • 142 F.3d 749
  • 1998 WL 205914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to present evidence of defendant’s organic brain disorder as part of a strategic decision not to present mitigating evidence that would fail to portray the defendant as a normal individual capable of rehabilitation
  • \[T]he Circuit Executive may seek an explanation of the reasons why the court has not complied with the time limitations.\ (emphasis added)
  • counsel 12 exercised reasonable strategic judgment by “steer[ing] away from” evidence of organic 13 brain dysfunction, “calculating that it would not help portray [Petitioner] as normal and 14 capable of rehabilitation”
  • “It is certainly reasonable for counsel not to raise unmeritorious claims”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Williams, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Truesdale v. Moore

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.