· 4/6/2005
Robin McKennel Lovitt v. William Page True, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Citations
- 403 F.3d 171
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5438
- 2005 WL 767416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that although there may have been “a serious error in judgment” in failing to preserve evidence, “there existed no evidence of bad faith on anyone’s part”
- holding that although there may have been \a serious error in judgment\ in failing to preserve evidence, \there existed no evidence of bad faith on anyone's part\
- noting that, to pursue a particular theory at sentencing, though it may ultimately fail, often “reflects not incompetence, but rather a sound strategic choice”
- distinguishing in the context of the Youngblood analysis even “a serious error in judgment” from bad faith
- distinguishing in the context of the Youngblood analysis even \a serious error in judgment\ from bad faith
- finding exception to Brady where defendant could have questioned doctor about her opinion regarding the murder weapon’s potential to inflict the victim’s wounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Traxler, Wilkinson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.