Skip to main content
· 4/6/2005

Robin McKennel Lovitt v. William Page True, Warden, Sussex I State Prison

Citations

  • 403 F.3d 171
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5438
  • 2005 WL 767416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although there may have been “a serious error in judgment” in failing to preserve evidence, “there existed no evidence of bad faith on anyone’s part”
  • holding that although there may have been \a serious error in judgment\ in failing to preserve evidence, \there existed no evidence of bad faith on anyone's part\
  • noting that, to pursue a particular theory at sentencing, though it may ultimately fail, often “reflects not incompetence, but rather a sound strategic choice”
  • distinguishing in the context of the Youngblood analysis even “a serious error in judgment” from bad faith
  • distinguishing in the context of the Youngblood analysis even \a serious error in judgment\ from bad faith
  • finding exception to Brady where defendant could have questioned doctor about her opinion regarding the murder weapon’s potential to inflict the victim’s wounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traxler, Wilkinson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.