Skip to main content
First Circuit· 9/18/1985

James Barber v. James Ponte

Citations

  • 772 F.2d 982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A large discrepancy occurring over a sustained period of time where there is an opportunity for arbitrary selection is sufficient to demonstrate that the exclusion of the underrepresentation is systematic— that is, inherent in the particular jury selection process utilized.”
  • ages 18-34 is not a distinctive group

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Bownes, Coffin, Torru-Ella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

91 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.