Mickens v. Greene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Saunders’ reasons for failing to pursue investigative leads “are not defensible”
• concluding that Saunders' reasons for failing to pursue investigative leads \are not defensible\
• noting that Saunders' view that he had no continuing allegiance to Hall was \remarkably wrong\
• noting that Saunders’ view that he had no continuing allegiance to Hall was “remarkably wrong”
• finding that Saunders had a “myopic view of the potential conflicts and [an] utter insensitivity to the ethical issues raised by the facts”
• finding that Saunders had a \myopic view of the potential conflicts and [an] utter insensitivity to the ethical issues raised by the facts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).