· 7/30/1998
United States v. Michael Crandale Williams
Citations
- 152 F.3d 294
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17453
- 1998 WL 429863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declin- ing to exercise discretion to notice an erroneous jury instruction where evidence of guilt was overwhelming
- \The trial court is not required to define reasonable doubt as a matter of course so long as the jury is instructed that a defendant’s guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.\
- “The trial court is not required to define reasonable doubt as a matter of course so long as the jury is instructed that a defendant’s guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
- expressing disdain for further definitions of reasonable doubt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael, Motz, Phillips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.