Skip to main content
· 7/30/1998

United States v. Michael Crandale Williams

Citations

  • 152 F.3d 294
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17453
  • 1998 WL 429863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declin- ing to exercise discretion to notice an erroneous jury instruction where evidence of guilt was overwhelming
  • \The trial court is not required to define reasonable doubt as a matter of course so long as the jury is instructed that a defendant’s guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.\
  • “The trial court is not required to define reasonable doubt as a matter of course so long as the jury is instructed that a defendant’s guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • expressing disdain for further definitions of reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael, Motz, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.