Skip to main content
· 3/15/2001

Robert F. Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell, Board of Education, Body Corporate Cromwell Board of Education Body Corporate

Citations

  • 243 F.3d 93
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 5145
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,939
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rejection of plaintiff in favor of significantly younger applicant, who was also over forty, can support an inference of age discrimination
  • holding that ..the fact that the defendant had not “asserted that [its] destruction was merely accidental” was “evidence of intentional destruction sufficient to show a culpable state of mind”
  • concluding that the defendants’ promise to make available destroyed information suggests that that information existed at the time the promise was made
  • holding that simply “gesturing toward the hiring process as a whole” will not suffice
  • concluding that the employer’s explanation that it made its hiring decision based on interview performances is sufficient to shift burden to plaintiff to show that the explanation is a pretext
  • concluding that the employer’s explanation that it made its hiring decision based on interview performances is sufficient to shift burden to plaintiff to show that the explanation is a pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Miner, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.